The news that grabs me
today: Of course, there is the
demolition of Eric Cantor; also, the California judge’s ruling against teacher
tenure.
It’s sad that many parents
who are outraged by the disastrously low quality of education think that the
answer is a war to get rid of bad teachers and to weaken teacher’s unions. Not
surprisingly, inadequate teachers and bad schools plague poor and minority
communities especially. But things have taken a bizarre turn in the name of
“education reform”. Instead of an emphasis on preparing and recruiting many
more good teachers, of making teaching attractive and highly valued by society,
of investing in better schools and educational support, the thrust is to make
it easier to fire teachers, to demonize unions, to devalue and shrink public
schools.
Sad, too, that many liberals who
are solidly against the wars on women, on the unemployed and the homeless, on
voting rights, and so on, nevertheless, buy into the anti-union thrust of purported
“education reform”. Whatever improvements need to be made in teacher evaluation
and performance through strong interaction between parents, educators, and
unions, there is little question as to what outlawing tenure would mean.
Further weakening unions would do nothing to make teaching more attractive.
Rather it would give unlimited power over hiring, firing, conditions of work
and educational process to those in authority. That would open the way to
arbitrariness, acts of personal and political prejudice, such as sullied the practices
of many education administrators when conformity was demanded at the expense of
civil liberties.
No wonder that war against
teacher and public employee unions is top priority for Scott Walker, the Koch
brothers and ALEC: just leave everything up to the boss.
* * *
How can one not get a charge
out of what happened to Eric Cantor? Just desserts! Still, there is a queasy feeling.
One can hope that this stunning turn of events will weaken the GOP’s electoral
prospects, but there’s more reason for alarm than for celebration in the Tea
Party’s promotion of anti-immigrant and racist poison.
I wonder who is most pained
by Cantor’s debacle. There is AIPAC and Netanyahu, for whom Cantor was foremost
champion in Congress of total support for Israel’s occupation regime; he also
tried his darndest to undermine any negotiations with Iran. Then there is David
Brooks and others trying to save the GOP through a “new” conservative agenda,
one with a more human face, one that acknowledges the concerns of ordinary
folk.
The last time this “new” Republican thinking tried to makeover a harsh public image, we got “compassionate conservatism” with George W. Bush. ‘Not this time’, according to Cantor’s nemesis, David Brat, and the Tea Party cohort. The prevailing GOP winds are not going the way of the “new” (once again?) reformers.
The last time this “new” Republican thinking tried to makeover a harsh public image, we got “compassionate conservatism” with George W. Bush. ‘Not this time’, according to Cantor’s nemesis, David Brat, and the Tea Party cohort. The prevailing GOP winds are not going the way of the “new” (once again?) reformers.
No comments:
Post a Comment