A jury without a single black member reached a verdict in a court where the judge ruled out consideration of 'racial' issues in the killing of Trayvon Martin. But more than the judge and six jurors laid down the "not guilty" verdict, many more. Foremost were the governor and legislators who fashioned the "stand your ground" law. That law did just what it was intended to do; it gave sanction and encouragement to armed vigilante "justice" that made outcomes like the murder of Trayvon a virtual certainty. The "not guilty" verdict was laid down by a hidden jury, the American Legislative Exchange Council, funded by the Koch brothers and like-minded gun-happy billionaires who conspire to get "shoot first" laws like Florida's in every possible state. And if this case is an up-to-date version of an old, old story of Jim Crow justice, then the Supreme Court majority, which just threw out the Voting Rights Act with the suggestion that racism is past history, also stands in the shadow of what passes for justice in the Florida verdict. No, the Florida verdict is no more deserving of respect than the Supreme Court majority's verdicts in "Citizen's United" and voting rights and its underhanded rulings designed to cripple and ultimately do away with affirmative action. (An excellent article by Linda Greenhouse in the New York Times describes Chief Justice Roberts' somewhat hidden agenda and the folly of "compromises" that lay the groundwork for completely eliminating affirmative action and civil rights legislation.)
No. Racist verdicts and con games don't deserve respect, rather exposure and condemnation. The NAACP's demand to the Justice Department for a civil rights suit against Florida's vigilante law is what deserves respect and determined support.
* * *
Soon after this blog was posted, this comment from David: