When
important and unexpected developments shake up world and national affairs, I
have the impulse to step back and take another look at my own sense of “the big picture.”
Sometimes
I see (and hope) for major “turning points” when nothing fundamental has
changed or where the “turn” is to a new form of an old crisis. For me, the optimistic wish often proves
father to the thought. Examples: the belief that the post-World War II
agreements reached at Teheran made likely an era of “peaceful coexistence” between
the victorious allies; elation over the prospect that Gorbachev’s reforms would
achieve democratic socialism; overestimating the transformational impact of
Obama’s election.
With
the murderous events now overtaking Egypt, I can’t help but look back painfully
at what I wrote in my blog of February 28, 2011, Seeing the World By Way of Egypt:
“Egypt
is the latest example that relatively peaceful popular democratic revolts can
arise even under conditions of severe repression and dictatorship. It’s not
that the dictatorial regime shies away from using violence to the maximum
extent feasible: the Egyptian Health Ministry reports a toll of 365 deaths
during the uprising. It’s that it may not be feasible to unleash its full
arsenal of violence against a united, courageous and determined mass opposition
while the whole world is watching. Such revolts have ousted tyrants and
toppled their governments, although they have usually fallen short of achieving
fundamental social change.”
The 2011 blog outlines pretty fully my view at the
time of the “big picture”, how the “Arab Spring” reflected changing world
realities. It has enough conditional clauses and qualifications that I could
fall back on in the spirit of pundits who can never acknowledge personal
fallibility. But the terrible news from Egypt doesn’t leave me in a mood to minimize a grievous miscalculation.
No comments:
Post a Comment